1. Expanding Earth and Pangaea Theory
Here’s probably the least controversial of all three videos, but still very much out there. I posted this because, as someone not knowing much of plate tectonics, it makes as much as sense to me as the orthodox view of Pangaea. The Earth’s expansion here is explained through uniformitarianism means: the ocean floor “seams” gradually spread out and surface “new land” over millions of years. In that sense, the expanding Earth aligns more with mainstream theories. This was unexpected to me, because when you hear anything involving a lot of water, it’s associated much more with catastrophism.
Uniformitarianism and catastrophism can coexist, but catastrophism can explain some things that uniformitarianism has trouble with. I remember way back when, in 3rd or 4th grade general science class, when the teacher talked about wandering glaciers, melting as they travel and dropping boulders on the land, and that explains why we find these erratics of a certain type that aren’t found anywhere in the immediate area in which is was dropped, in strange places where those boulders shouldn’t be, and oftentimes in odd formations and piles. I always thought that was kind of a ridiculous explanation, that glaciers can pick up and move rocks like that, and that maybe it could happen a handful of times, but erratics are found everywhere around the world. When you are first learning specialized knowledge in the material sciences, especially when you’re young, you implicitly expect things to be a little strange. We don’t have anything to compare it to other than what we’ve experienced so far, and none of us have experienced or observed things at the atomic scale (chemistry, physics), or the cosmic scale (astronomy, astrophysics), or across extremely long durations, like in geology.
Catastrophism can make sense of the erratics, but not anything beyond a few generalities. Uniformitarianism proposes more details, and we warm up to that more easily because that’s what we expect from science. It’s uncomfortable to think of something like catastrophism because it could happen again and we wouldn’t know anything past a few guesses.
2. Matrix explained knowledge from the abyss
Possibly the successor to Otis Eugene Ray and the Time Cube website, is the originator of whoever produced this video. Not so much in the content, but in the way it’s presented and a little of the tone he strikes, though the video has far less overt mocking of normal belief systems. A great deal of time is spent in this video exposing ancient monuments, like the pyramids, as contrived structures as a fake history for modern humans. The real history, likely Tartaria and whatever cam before, was wiped out, so we had to be given something so we don’t get suspicious.
Something seems off about the Russian officer at the 56 minute mark…the way he’s carrying himself. His ribbons and winged medal on left side look angled and a bit sloppy, and he’s kind of hunched over, like his chest caved in a little. I don’t claim to know much about military etiquette, but it’s seems embarrassing to the office for decorated officers in uniform to slouch like that. Additionally, I don’t picture someone in his position realistically using the mannerisms and casual expressions the way the guy in the video does. It’s like he’s explaining how he won that game of durak that one time. I guess with the what the rest of the video addresses, it really doesn’t matter. It’s merely something that really jumped out at me.
Near the end there’s really poorly-lit footage of replicas of ancient energy harnessing objects, with some old school vector graphics to go along with them. That seemed to make to most sense out of anything else covered, but it very easily could’ve been faked. Those demonstrations need to be done again, without all the unnecessary darkness.
The original video from the creator got canned, but there are two other videos of interest attributed to him, many mirrors of which exist: No Trees on Flat Earth and Cosmic Mildew 2.0 (English). The former claims that trees used to be much larger than they are now, and that the flat-topped buttes we see around the world aren’t actual rock formations but stumps left from those trees. The latter video claims mushrooms, spores, and molds, as an alien—or interdemensional, whatever, it’s hard to tell sometimes—scourge meant to slowly destroy life on Earth. Bacteriophages were created by an opposing, non-predatory force assisting humanity. It’s a crazy ride if you can get past the really janky narration in both.
3. The Lost History Of The Flat Earth
This one is the most comprehensive, and—dare I say?—sensible out of all of them, when you note how much material it covers. It goes through ideas in a logical, and mostly chronological order: first looking at the old Tartarian architecture, to the unexplained surge of orphans in the early 19th century, to electromagnetic transmitters, to cymatics and something to do with water as a store of energy, to (finally!) the flat Earth, to the moon as a map of Earth, to the equinox and a comprehensive explanation of the real movements of the system of heavenly bodies. The flat Earth part of that is loosely tied to the Tartarian tech by a small claim, that the complicated architecture and energy-harnessing decorations left behind couldn’t work on a globed Earth, for whatever reason.
The narration is hard to take in at first, but out of all of these crazy videos, it ends up rather engaging when you get accustomed to it. One of the comments, either on this video or on one of its mirrors, recommends listening to it all at 1.5x speed, so the guy’s British drawl isn’t so taxing (anyone know what regional accent he has?).
Here’s a related bonus video, which slightly contradicts the claim in this Lost History video of the moon being a projection of the Earth’s surface. In this one, Earth exists in a secluded crater, as part of a much larger realm that only the elites know about, and the moon is a time-dilated mirror image version of the Earth, where the moon’s phases are actually one day stretched out over a lunar month as we perceive it. So the moon is an image of the Earth from a way long time ago.
2 Comments
Re: the first video. The earth may well be expanding, but subduction is an established fact. Furthermore, a subduction zone is too obvious when you see it. It’s also the only explanation for volcanoes.
I recall the Time Cube. The only thing I can remember is how ludicrous it was. Except for the first one, the videos are ridiculously long and I won’t watch them. I’ve seen so very many of these wild theories that I’ve already had enough.
Yeah, I didn’t quite get the subduction thing. I thought it was pretty well established and not easily contestable. I’m wondering if the expanding earth, the way it’s posed here, could exist alongside subduction, but it doesn’t look like it.