I never quite liked intelligent design theory completely. It has interesting points but it rationalized things in a vacuum, as we have no other universe to compare statistical notes, or, if we’re feeling actually scientific: no other universe with which we can experiment, observe, conclude, duplicate the results. The theory also implies that God is somehow restricted to creating life under certain circumstances: He had to fine tune the universe for us to live. Or, that life has to reside inside a certain configuration of atoms (humans) instead of whatever God decides to breathe life into (Genesis 2:6-8). I try not to be in the business of telling God what He can and can’t do—though I’d say the Lord breathing life into a hypercube is a really good premise for a story.
Lawrence Krauss, not a believer by any stretch, argues for design but from the opposite direction. He maintains that, if anything, life was specifically designed for the physical conditions of the universe. Either way, it doesn’t matter. You can believe in the “God of the gaps” (it’s not a cop out if you don’t believe we need a material cause for everything) or you believe in some form of multiple universes in which life has an infinite number of attempts to emerge.
4 Comments
I decided a long time ago that I simply do not need to explain origins. I don’t have an obligation to make the Bible match our current knowledge of such things, since the Bible doesn’t really address it on our terms. Rather, we need to understand biblical terms and hold ourselves accountable to what Scripture does say.
I’d probably latch onto intelligent design simply because proponents of scientism despise it so much. 😀 I can’t stand how on every Wikipedia entry it has to be added that the theory is a “pseudoscience.”
Lawrence Krauss … his manners during the debate with William Lane Craig were terrible!
Graham – Is there a specific video you’re referencing? I found a few of them on yt.
Ed – I feel the same way. I just find the topic fascinating, more on a creative/curious level than intellectual.
Yup, here it is!
https://youtu.be/V82uGzgoajI