This argument is very weak because it’s just a framework. A more realer philosopher-guy needs to put some meat on the steps. Additionally, this can only work for skeptics, who by dint of their beliefs must claim to know a lot more about metaphysical truths than theists*, and in purely materialist epistemological terms.
Enjoy!
1. God has a past.
2. God is such a being that holds properties to the greatest conceivable degree.
3. Therefore, God’s past must be the largest out of anything (1 + 2).
4. Creation (humans, rivers, quarks, etc.) has a past.
5. God’s past plus the past of all created things is greater that God’s past (deductive logic/math).
6. Therefore, God does not exist or cannot exist as currently conceived since He has one thing (His past) that is not the largest out of anything conceivable (3 – 5).
* Real theists are painfully aware of how unknowable God really is, but skeptics spin like lassos their arguments like the matter is settled. Most of those frumpy-minded theists among us that self-glorify themselves as God’s direct mouthpiece can be safely ignored.
2 Comments
Statement number 5 is neither mathematical, nor deductive logic, it is simply dull witted nonsense. This is the same type of stupid argument put forward by unintelligent persons: An all powerful, benevolent Being could not exist because … (my definition of Him doesn’t include allowing for the kinds of things He allows to happen).
Picking on fake Christians doesn’t prove anything other than that you are an idiot, if by beating them in logic, you feel you’ve proven the non-existence of God.
Man up in the game and take on the Vedas, you teenie brained crackpot.
Tee-hee.